Chief Aspects To Think About When Shopping For Critical Illness Insurance

October 21, 2009 | Posted by admin

Summary
Lots of people in the street with critical illness cover don’t really appreciate how these insurance policies work. There are arguments for more comprehensive guidelines on the marketing of such insurance policies. Consumers need plenty of information on insurance which best suit their individual needs.

The chief financial regulator expressed its concern four years ago that many thousands of policyholders did not understand what their policies covered. Those fears still remain true.

The Financial Services Authority, the city regulator, commentated that research proved that insurance providers, including insurers, banks, financial advisers, and supermarkets often made little effort to understand if the insurance plan was appropriate and no explanation was provided to policy holders of how policies work. While most organisations were working to apply higher standards, others carried on offering an inadequate service. But that does not apply to quotes for mortgage cover.

In the event that a stroke, heart attack, cancer or other specified life-threatening illnesses is diagnosed, critical illness cover, insurance pays out a capital sum. Almost without exception, it is those who are worried about paying off loans or mortgages if they should be unable to continue working, who purchase this cover.

There are two types: those with a guaranteed fixed premium each month and those where the monthly payments increase over time. Figures from the Association of British Insurers suggest that, in total, there are over of 5m insurance policies covering 11m clients. An average policy will pay out sixty seven thousand pounds. Many of these policies will have been provided by the life insurance shop.

These “protection” policies have proved controversial. While the ploicies might be very benefitial, these “protection” life insurance plans have proved controversial and commentators observe that not many policyholders make a claim. There are no statistics available on the numbers of claims made in comparison with the total expenditure on the premiums. The City Regulator review did demonstrate, however, that on average, 24% of the claims made are not paid out.

Recently, with in one policy a client was diagnosed with cancer but medical consultants could not identify which one. The client was regretably told it was unlikely doctors would know for certain until he was five feet under.

Until they could understand exactly what illness he had, his insurance company would not pay out. The plan holder’s financial advisers appealed realising that should he die, the insurer would pay out a life insurance policy worth twenty thousand pounds rather than the critical illness plan which was worth eighty five thousand pounds as only one policy could pay out. The argument with the underwriters caused infinitely more stress to the customer. After a public fight, the insurer agreed with the claimant and paid out on the critical illness plan.

Which?, previously known as the Consumers’ Association, said it thinks the situation is significantly more serious than the City Regulator claims and that sales of critical illness arrangements are at the centre of a mis-selling scandal.

John Beer, principal policy adviser, says finance companies, brokers and commission-hungry advisers, saw a good chance to make a big pay off. He said Which? had forecast the mis-selling was seen with payment protection insurance and would be replicated in the critical illness business.

His observations are on the back of complaints in in government regarding the mis-selling of critical illness insurance plans. Max Bing, the MP, says the City Regulator’s study proves that there is a big risk that plans are being sold to the public who cannot appreciate what they are buying or who don’t even need them. The MP wants the FSA change its rules that would restrict sales to be made by financial advisers working under stricter guidelines.

Bookmark It